Quantcast

PENNSYLVANIA RECORD

Thursday, May 2, 2024

Suit over maintenance man's fatal MDS may be sent to Commerce and Complex Litigation Center

State Court
Webp michaeljdamico

D'Amico | D'Amico Law Offices

PITTSBURGH – A suit alleging that a woman’s late husband was subjected to a variety of hazardous and toxic substances in his maintenance duties for U.S. Steel, including benzene – which she maintains caused her husband’s death in 2021 from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) – may be transferred to Allegheny County’s Commerce and Complex Litigation Center.

Phyllis Diane Zellers (as Administratrix of the Estate of Dennis Roy Zellers, deceased) of La Belle first filed suit in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas on Nov. 14 versus Aristech Surfaces, LLC (successor in interest to Aristech Chemical Corporation) of Kentucky; Aristech Chemical International Limited (doing business as “Aristech Chemical Corporation”) of Texas; Braskem America, Inc. (formerly known as “Aristech Chemical Corporation”) of Pennsylvania; Beazer East, Inc. (in its own right and as successor to Koppers Company, Inc., and other related companies) of Pittsburgh; Clairton 1314B L.P. of Pennsylvania; Energy Transfer (R&M), LLC (in its own right and as successor to Sunoco, Inc. and successor in interest to Aristech Chemical Corporation) of Pennsylvania; Koppers, Inc. (in its own right, and as successor in interest to, Koppers Company, Inc.) of Pennsylvania; State Street Enterprises, LLC (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Commercial Liability Partners, LLC, in its own right and as successor in interest to Koppers, Inc.) of Florida; Sunoco, Inc. (as successor in interest to Aristech Chemical Corporation) of Pennsylvania and United States Steel Corporation, of Pittsburgh.

“Decedent was born on April 20, 1952 and died on Nov. 29, 2021 at the age of 69 years of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and complications thereof. From 1970 through 2016, decedent was employed by United States Steel Corporation as a boilermaker/maintenance man at the United States Steel Corporation Clairton Plant. The phrase ‘Clairton Plant’ is hereinafter used to refer to the entire United States Steel Corporation Clairton Plant. This includes but is not limited to the portions at one time owned and/or operated by Aristech Chemical Corporation and/or Koppers, Inc. and/or the Tarben Chemical Division,” the suit said.

“From 1970 through 2016, Decedent performed his job throughout the Clairton Plant. This includes but is not limited to the following areas: Coke Batteries, Boiler Houses, Chemical Facilities, Benzene Plant, Tar Plant, Tarben Plant, Carbon Materials, Chemicals Plant and Keystone Plant, as well as all other areas of the Clairton Plant.”

The suit added that survival and wrongful death claims are brought within a two-year statute of limitations and on behalf of both the plaintiff and hers and the decedent’s three children.

“During the aforementioned relevant time period, defendants knew that the process of making coke and/or using, obtaining, storing, collecting, processing, distilling and/or refining by-products related to the coke making process, created and released by-products into the work environment of employees at the Clairton Plant, including decedent. During the aforesaid years, defendants deliberately and intentionally failed to disclose, inform and/or warn decedent and other workers of the presence and/or extent of exposures to by-products in their work environment,” the suit stated, in part.

“During the years aforesaid, defendants knew or should have known that byproducts are toxic to the hematopoietic system of humans and are a recognized cause of multiple blood disorders including MDS. During the aforesaid years, defendants deliberately and intentionally withheld their knowledge from decedent that by-products at decedent’s workplace are toxic to the hematopoietic system of humans and are a recognized cause of multiple blood disorders, including MDS. During the years aforesaid, decedent’s job required him to work in various areas of the Clairton Plant where he had regular, frequent, and proximate inhalation and dermal exposure to by-products as a result of defendants actions and/or inactions with the coke making process and/or the using, obtaining, storing, collecting, processing, distilling and/or refining of by-products related to the coke making process.”

The suit continued that the defendants, working in concert, “deliberately and intentionally failed to monitor decedent’s inhalation and dermal exposure to by-products that were produced by coke ovens and batteries, as well as emissions from using, obtaining, storing, collecting, processing, distilling and/or refining by-products related to the coke making process” and that “the aforesaid frequent, regular and proximate exposure to by-products was the direct, proximate and legal cause of decedent developing MDS, resulting in his death.”

UPDATE

On Jan. 5, defendant Koppers, Inc. filed an uncontested motion to transfer the case to the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas’s Commerce and Complex Litigation Center.

“Defendant submits that it is in the interest of all parties that this case be declared complex and assigned to a single judge. This case will benefit significantly from case management. Factors favoring complex designation of this matter include: (1) The number of separately-represented parties with differing interests; (2) The number of anticipated motions; (3) The complexity of the factual and legal issues; (4) The amount of the controversy; and (5) The time it may take for the case to be tried,” the motion stated.

“More specifically, this case involves complicated issues relating to general and specific medical causation which will necessitate extensive expert involvement. The parties anticipate that numerous motions will be filed based on expert opinions and other matters. The parties further believe the amount in controversy and the time it will take to try this case given the number of anticipated experts require complex handling by the Court. Plaintiff has consented to this motion.”

For multiple counts of negligence, premises liability, strict liability, negligence to others on adjacent property, survival, wrongful death and civil conspiracy, the plaintiff is seeking compensatory damages in an amount in excess of $50,000, and for punitive damages in an amount sufficient to punish defendants and deter defendants and others from future acts of wanton disregard for others’ safety.

The plaintiff is represented by Anthony J. D’Amico and Michael J. D’Amico of D’Amico Law Offices, in Pittsburgh.

Defendant Koppers, Inc. is represented by Christopher D. Stofko and Katlyn A. Stone of Dickie McCamey & Chilcote, also in Pittsburgh.

Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas case GD-23-013127

From the Pennsylvania Record: Reach Courts Reporter Nicholas Malfitano at nick.malfitano@therecordinc.com

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

More News