Quantcast

PENNSYLVANIA RECORD

Wednesday, May 8, 2024

Bed Bath & Beyond shopper says his 3-year-old daughter struck her head on a bathroom sink

State Court
Bed bath beyond 1280

PITTSBURGH – A Western Pennsylvania plaintiff says his young daughter suffered a head injury and facial scarring after they hit their head on the sharp, angular edge of a restroom’s free-standing sink at Bed Bath & Beyond.

Jonathan Matthews (on behalf of his minor child, R.M.) of Allegheny County filed suit in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas on Oct. 29 versus Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc., of Monroeville. The lawsuit complains that the store did not have a family restroom, requiring his young daughters to use the women's restroom without his supervision.

“On Sept. 3, 2020, Matthews was lawfully at the subject location with two of his children, R.M. (three years old) and A.M. (eight years old) at Corporation’s retail store at the subject location. While in the subject location, R.M. indicated that she had to use the restroom. Matthews, R.M. and A.M. walked to the public restrooms located in the subject location,” the suit states.

“Matthews waited outside the 'Women’s' restroom while A.M. and R.M. entered the restroom. Upon entry of the restroom, R.M. encountered a ‘free standing’ sink. This sink had sharp angular edges and was the precise height of R.M.’s forehead. R.M.’s head hit the sink’s angular and sharp edge.”

Matthews says he and his children were frightened by the occurrence, and R.M. was taken to the hospital for treatment for her head laceration.

“Corporation has a duty of care and responsibility to their business invitees, including but not limited to R.M. to reasonably and safely design its facilities. As a direct and proximate result of Corporation’s breaches, R.M. suffered physical injury, specifically, her lacerated forehead, and future facial scarring,” per the suit.

“R.M.’s injury was reasonably foreseeable, as Corporation is open to the public, Corporation did not have a “Family” or unisex bathroom, sharp angular edges have a high likelihood of causing injuries including but not limited to lacerations, and almost every human being, between birth and full growth, will at some point, will have their head at the exact height of the sharp angular sink.”

For a count of negligence, the plaintiff is seeking damages in excess of the arbitration limits of the county, plus costs, interest and a trial by jury.

The plaintiff is represented by Martell Harris of The Trial Law Firm, in Pittsburgh.

The defendant has not yet secured legal counsel.

Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas case GD-20-011243

From the Pennsylvania Record: Reach Courts Reporter Nicholas Malfitano at nick.malfitano@therecordinc.com

More News