Pennsylvania Record

Sunday, August 25, 2019

Third Circuit court makes surprising decision to decertify class action suit

By S. Laney Griffo | Sep 29, 2016

PHILADELPHIA – Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit made a surprising decision to decertify a class action lawsuit regarding the drug Modafinil.

The court found the number of members in the class was not enough to constitute class action status. 

Ten years ago, Cephalon, a drug manufacturer, allegedly paid several generic drug manufacturers to not make generic versions of the drug Modafinil.

Court decertifies class action suit | Shutterstock

About 20 direct pharmaceutical purchasers came together to form a class-action lawsuit against the branded and generic manufacturers. They claimed the manufacturers were keeping the prices high for Modafinil by preventing generic versions from being made.

In July, the motion for class action was granted by Judge Mitchell S. Goldberg of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. He granted class certification on grounds that the plaintiffs' claim satisfied the numerosity and predominance requirements of Rule 23 of Federal Rules of Civil Practice.

“Starting in the ‘90s, people have voiced skepticism about whether Rule 23 and class actions suits are doing what they’re intended to do,” Lindsay Breedlove, an associate with Pepper Hamilton, told the Pennsylvania Record.

The numerosity requirement states, “The class is so numerous that joinder of class members is impracticable.” The predominance requirement states, “There are common questions of law or fact that predominate over any individual class member’s questions and that a class action is superior to other methods of adjudication.”

“Judge Goldberg said the case was so far along, it's more economical to certify the class at this stage,” Robin Sumner, a partner at Pepper Hamilton, said.  

The Third Circuit found issue with Goldberg’s decision and decided 2-1 to decertify the class.

The Third Circuit did not believe this class action satisfied the numerosity requirement. Although a specific number requirement has not been set, traditionally classes have 20 or more members. 

The court will also look at the judicial economy, geography, financial resources of the members, their ability to sue separately, and requests for injunctive reliefs from the members.

This class does have at least 22 members; however, three of the members make up 97 percent of the market. This does not satisfy the requirements regarding judicial economy, financial resources of the members and their ability to sue separately, the Third Circuit ruled.

"They make millions of dollars each,” Sumner said. “They certainly could’ve brought an individual case. These are not small consumer claims.”

The respondents have until Oct. 14 to file a petition to have the whole court vote to rehear the case. It is rare for the court to grant a rehearing, but Sumner believes it might in this case.

“It’s a significant decision that surprised a lot of people and got a lot of attention,” Sumner said.

Want to get notified whenever we write about U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ?

Sign-up Next time we write about U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.

Organizations in this Story

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit