Pittsburgh medical office alleges Drycast sent unsolicited fax

By Louie Torres | Jan 16, 2018

PHILADELPHIA – A private Pittsburgh medical practice alleges that a Cleveland, Ohio company sent it unsolicited faxes.

Steven A. Conner DPM PC filed a complaint on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons on Jan. 11 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Dry Cast Holdings LLC, doing business as Drycast, alleging violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

According to the complaint, the defendant sent an unsolicited fax to the plaintiff in October 2015 promoting its DryCast Cast Protector product.

The plaintiff holds Dry Cast Holdings LLC responsible because the defendants alleged failed to obtain the plaintiff's permission before sending the fax and failed to include an opt-out notice as required by federal law.

The plaintiff seeks damages, punitive damages, court costs, and any further relief the court grants. It is represented by Richard Shenkan of Shenkan Injury Lawyer LLC in West Bloomfield, Michigan and Phillip A. Bock of Bock, Hatch, Lewis & Oppenheim LLC in Chicago.

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case number 2:18-cv-00139-AB

Want to get notified whenever we write about U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania ?

Sign-up Next time we write about U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.

Organizations in this Story

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

More News

The Record Network