Quantcast

Case activity for Courtney Keeler vs Esurance on Feb. 24

PENNSYLVANIA RECORD

Friday, November 22, 2024

Case activity for Courtney Keeler vs Esurance on Feb. 24

Filings
General court 07

shutterstock.com

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania reported the following activities in the suit brought by Courtney Keeler and Nathan Keeler against Esurance, Esurance Inc., Esurance Insurance Company and Esurance Insurance Services Inc. on Feb. 24.

'Notice Of Removal From Allegheny County Court Of Common Pleas, Case Number Gd-20-2107 With Jury Demand. Copies Attached: Complaint (filing Fee, Including Administrative Fee, $400, Receipt Number 0315-5480686), Filed By Esurance Insurance Services, Inc., Esurance Insurance Company, Esurance Inc., Esurance. (attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jjg)'

'Disclosure Statement Identifying Allstate Corporation As Corporate Parent Or Other Affiliate, By Esurance, Esurance Inc., Esurance Insurance Company, Esurance Insurance Services, Inc. (jjg)'

'As Detailed In The Accompanying Order, Given That Motions Pursuant To Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 12(b) Are Discouraged If The Pleading Defect Is Curable By Amendment, It Hereby Is Ordered That The Parties Must Meet And Confer Prior To The Filing Of Any Motion To Dismiss To Determine Whether It Can Be Avoided. The Duty To Meet And Confer Extends To Parties Appearing Pro Se. Consistent With The Foregoing, Motions To Dismiss Must Be Accompanied By A Certificate Of The Movant, Stating That The Moving Party Has Made A Good Faith Effort To Confer With The Nonmovant(s) To Determine Whether The Identified Pleading Deficiencies Properly May Be Cured By Amendment. Motions To Dismiss That Do Not Contain The Required Certification Will Be Summarily Denied. Signed By Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly On 02/24/2020. (tjw)'

Case number 2:20-cv-00271-MPK was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on Feb. 24.

More News