Quantcast

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania: Actions Taken on Dec. 10

PENNSYLVANIA RECORD

Sunday, December 22, 2024

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania: Actions Taken on Dec. 10

Filings
General court 07

shutterstock.com

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania reported the following activity on Dec. 10 in the suits below:

In Susan Stayrook against Instant Brands: 'Notice That The Instant Civil Action Has Been Designated For Placement Into The United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution Program. Parties Are Directed To Fully Complete The Required 26(f) Report, Which Includes The Stipulation Of Selecting An Adr Process. Counsel For Plaintiff (or In The Case Of A Removal Action, Counsel For Removing Defendant) Shall Make Service Of The Notice On All Parties. (krh)'

Case number 3:20-cv-00249-KRG was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

In David A. Phillips against Ej Express LLC and Mahamud Z. Sadala: 'Order Re Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 12(b) Motions To Dismiss, More Fully Stated In Said Order. Signed By Judge Cathy Bissoon On 12/10/20. (jhi)'

Case number 1:20-cv-00354-CB was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

In Queen City Concrete Inc. against Southwestern Pennsylvania and Western Maryland Area Teamsters & Employers Pension Fund:

'Summons Issued As To Southwestern Pennsylvania And Western Maryland Area Teamsters & Employers Pension Fund (jjg)'

'Clerk's Office Quality Control Message Re 1 Complaint. Error: Party Did Not File Disclosure Statement As Required Pursuant L.r. 7.1.1. Correction: Attorney Advised To File Statement Within 7 Days. This Message Is For Informational Purposes Only. Disclosure Statement Due By 12/17/2020. (jjg)'

'Order: As Detailed In The Accompanying Order, Given That Motions Pursuant To Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 12(b) Are Discouraged If The Pleading Defect Is Curable By Amendment, It Hereby Is Ordered That The Parties Must Meet And Confer Prior To The Filing Of Any Motion To Dismiss To Determine Whether It Can Be Avoided. The Duty To Meet And Confer Extends To Parties Appearing Pro Se. Consistent With The Foregoing, Motions To Dismiss Must Be Accompanied By A Certificate Of The Movant, Stating That The Moving Party Has Made A Good Faith Effort To Confer With The Nonmovant(s) To Determine Whether The Identified Pleading Deficiencies Properly May Be Cured By Amendment. Motions To Dismiss That Do Not Contain The Required Certification Will Be Summarily Denied. Signed By Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly On 12/10/20. (ndf)'

'Notice Of Appearance By Scott Michael Hare On Behalf Of Queen City Concrete, Inc.. (hare, Scott)'

'Disclosure Statement Identifying None As Corporate Parent Or Other Affiliate, By Queen City Concrete, Inc.. (hare, Scott)'

'Notice Of Appearance By Anthony Thomas Gestrich On Behalf Of Queen City Concrete, Inc.. (gestrich, Anthony)'

Case number 2:20-cv-01921-MPK was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

In Napco Inc. against Vorteq Coil Finishers LLC: 'Complaint Against Vorteq Coil Finishers, Llc (filing Fee, Including Administrative Fee, $402, Receipt Number Apawdc-6149600), Filed By Napco, Inc.. (attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E) (elt)'

Case number 2:20-cv-01925-LPL was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

More News