Quantcast

Model wins more than $1M after picture in dressing room falls on her

PENNSYLVANIA RECORD

Friday, December 20, 2024

Model wins more than $1M after picture in dressing room falls on her

Federal Court
Mitchell s goldberg judge mitchell s goldberg

Mitchell S. Goldberg | paed.uscourts.gov

PHILADELPHIA - It's a seven-figure payday for a model who sued Neiman Marcus after a picture fell on her in a dressing room while on a photo shoot.

Philadelphia federal judge Mitchell Goldberg in November granted summary judgment to Paris Inman-Clark, who sued the clothing retailer five years ago. All that was left was to determine how much she would win.

A jury this week awarded her $1,250,000, with Goldberg entering the final judgment on Dec. 17.

"Common sense dictates that heavy objects must be securely hung, especially in an environment such as a department store with many customers," Goldberg wrote in November.

"I first note that paintings do not typically fall from walls on their own volition when they have been safely affixed. Put another way, this incident is certainly the type that does not ordinarily occur absent negligence."

Inman-Clark was working as a part-time model for the Reinhard Model & Talent Agency in Philadelphia, which had been hired by Marchesa - a Neiman Marcus brand. In 2017, she was to model gowns at the store and was waiting in a personal shopper dressing room for an employee to photograph her in one of them.

Two large, wooden-framed paintings were hung in the dressing room. When the door was shut, the top picture fell and struck Inman-Clark in the head, causing a concussion.

She sued for negligence. The years that went by revealed the painting had been hung earlier that year, and Goldberg found Neiman Marcus breached its duty of care to business invitees by hanging a heavy object on a wall in an area customers and others would frequent.

Given it only took three months after it was hung to fall, Goldberg said that circumstantial evidence points toward negligence.

Neiman never pointed to facts that the painting was hung properly and could only argue other factors, like an earthquake, could have caused it to fall. A Neiman Marcus employee said safety inspectors checked mirrors but not wall hangings.

"This undisputed evidence unequivocally establishes that Neiman recognized that it had a duty to exercise reasonable care to discover conditions on its premises which posed an unreasonable risk of harm to its invitees which they were unlikely to discover or protect themselves against," Goldberg wrote.

David Langfitt of Langfitt PLLC in Gladwyne and Melanie Garner of The Garner Firm in Philadelphia represented Inman-Clark.

Attorneys at the firm Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads represented Neiman Marcus, which can appeal the ruling.

More News