Al Media
Recent News About Al Media
-
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania: Actions Taken on March 23
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reported the following activity on March 23 in the suits below: -
Case activity for Strike 3 Holdings LLC vs John Doe Subscriber Assigned Ip Address 98.114.58.132 on March 23
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reported the following activities in the suit brought by Strike 3 Holdings LLC against John Doe Subscriber Assigned Ip Address 98.114.58.132 on March 23. -
Case activity for Strike 3 Holdings LLC vs John Doe Subscriber Assigned Ip Address 98.114.236.7 on March 23
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reported the following activities in the suit brought by Strike 3 Holdings LLC against John Doe Subscriber Assigned Ip Address 98.114.236.7 on March 23. -
Case activity for Strike 3 Holdings LLC vs John Doe Subscriber Assigned Ip Address 100.11.18.212 on March 23
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reported the following activities in the suit brought by Strike 3 Holdings LLC against John Doe Subscriber Assigned Ip Address 100.11.18.212 on March 23. -
Case activity for Strike 3 Holdings LLC vs John Doe Subscriber Assigned Ip Address 173.49.89.230 on March 23
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reported the following activities in the suit brought by Strike 3 Holdings LLC against John Doe Subscriber Assigned Ip Address 173.49.89.230 on March 23. -
Case activity for Strike 3 Holdings LLC vs John Doe Subscriber Assigned Ip Address 71.185.184.72 on March 23
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reported the following activities in the suit brought by Strike 3 Holdings LLC against John Doe Subscriber Assigned Ip Address 71.185.184.72 on March 23. -
Case activity for Strike 3 Holdings LLC vs John Doe Subscriber Assigned Ip Address 141.151.20.149 on March 23
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reported the following activities in the suit brought by Strike 3 Holdings LLC against John Doe Subscriber Assigned Ip Address 141.151.20.149 on March 23. -
Case activity for Strike 3 Holdings LLC vs John Doe Subscriber Assigned Ip Address 98.115.70.98 on March 23
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reported the following activities in the suit brought by Strike 3 Holdings LLC against John Doe Subscriber Assigned Ip Address 98.115.70.98 on March 23. -
Case activity for Strike 3 Holdings LLC vs John Doe Subscriber Assigned Ip Address 71.185.197.82 on March 23
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reported the following activities in the suit brought by Strike 3 Holdings LLC against John Doe Subscriber Assigned Ip Address 71.185.197.82 on March 23. -
Case activity for Strike 3 Holdings LLC vs John Doe Subscriber Assigned Ip Address 173.49.88.80 on March 23
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reported the following activities in the suit brought by Strike 3 Holdings LLC against John Doe Subscriber Assigned Ip Address 173.49.88.80 on March 23. -
Case activity for Strike 3 Holdings LLC vs John Doe Subscriber Assigned Ip Address 173.49.152.42 on March 23
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reported the following activities in the suit brought by Strike 3 Holdings LLC against John Doe Subscriber Assigned Ip Address 173.49.152.42 on March 23. -
Case activity for Strike 3 Holdings LLC vs John Doe Subscriber Assigned Ip Address 98.115.30.156 on March 23
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reported the following activities in the suit brought by Strike 3 Holdings LLC against John Doe Subscriber Assigned Ip Address 98.115.30.156 on March 23. -
Taxed face masks class action update: Dollar General and Aldi seek dismissal of case
PITTSBURGH – Counsel for Dollar General and Aldi argue that allegations brought against them and other retailers which said they unlawfully charged sales taxes on the purchases of face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic are unsupported, and should be dismissed.