HARRISBURG – A landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the concept of specific jurisdiction in 2017 did not guide the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, when it affirmed a $12.85 million damages award in a pelvic mesh injury matter against a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reported the following activities in the suit brought by Alexandre Pelletier, Benefit Fund of Chicago, Fernando Inzunza and Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago against Endo International PLC, Paul V. Campanelli, Rajiv Kanishka Liyanaarchchie De Silva and Suketu P. Upadhyay on Sept. 25.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reported the following activities in the suit brought by Alexandre Pelletier, Benefit Fund of Chicago, Fernando Inzunza and Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago against Endo International PLC, Paul V. Campanelli, Rajiv Kanishka Liyanaarchchie De Silva and Suketu P. Upadhyay on Sept. 24.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reported the following activity in the suit brought by Alexandre Pelletier, Benefit Fund of Chicago, Fernando Inzunza and Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago against Endo International PLC, Paul V. Campanelli, Rajiv Kanishka Liyanaarchchie De Silva and Suketu P. Upadhyay on Oct. 22.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reported the following activity in the suit brought by Alexandre Pelletier, Benefit Fund of Chicago, Fernando Inzunza and Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago against Endo International PLC, Paul V. Campanelli, Rajiv Kanishka Liyanaarchchie De Silva and Suketu P. Upadhyay on Oct. 7.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reported the following activities in the suit brought by Alexandre Pelletier, Benefit Fund of Chicago, Fernando Inzunza and Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago against Endo International PLC, Paul V. Campanelli, Rajiv Kanishka Liyanaarchchie De Silva and Suketu P. Upadhyay on Oct. 6.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reported the following activity in the suit brought by Alexandre Pelletier, Benefit Fund of Chicago, Fernando Inzunza and Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago against Endo International PLC, Paul V. Campanelli, Rajiv Kanishka Liyanaarchchie De Silva and Suketu P. Upadhyay on Oct. 9.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reported the following activity in the suit brought by Alexandre Pelletier, Benefit Fund of Chicago, Fernando Inzunza and Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago against Endo International PLC, Paul V. Campanelli, Rajiv Kanishka Liyanaarchchie De Silva and Suketu P. Upadhyay on Sept. 30.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reported the following activity in the suit brought by Alexandre Pelletier, Benefit Fund of Chicago, Fernando Inzunza and Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago against Endo International PLC, Paul V. Campanelli, Rajiv Kanishka Liyanaarchchie De Silva and Suketu P. Upadhyay on Oct. 20.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reported the following activities in the suit brought by Alexandre Pelletier, Benefit Fund of Chicago, Fernando Inzunza and Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago against Endo International PLC, Paul V. Campanelli, Rajiv Kanishka Liyanaarchchie De Silva and Suketu P. Upadhyay on Oct. 2.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reported the following activity in the suit brought by Alexandre Pelletier, Benefit Fund of Chicago, Fernando Inzunza and Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago against Endo International PLC, Paul V. Campanelli, Rajiv Kanishka Liyanaarchchie De Silva and Suketu P. Upadhyay on Oct. 14.
PHILADELPHIA – A Texas man and a California private investigation firm who were the targets of a class action lawsuit over fraud claims, have dropped their litigation against the attorneys behind the class action.
The following cases categorized as "insurance" were on the docket in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on Sept. 16. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania reported the following activity in the suit brought by Samuel Anthony Ettaro against California Casualty Indemnity Exchange on Sept. 16: 'Notice Of Removal From The Court Of Common, Case Number G.d. 20-007569 With Jury Demand (filing Fee, Including Administrative Fee, $400, Receipt Number Apawdc-5916618), Filed By California Casualty Indemnity Exchange. (attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B) (cel)'.
The following cases categorized as "labor" were on the docket in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on Sept. 10. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
