Quantcast

Fla. energy company says Tucker Arensberg and its attorneys acted fraudulently in land deal; Firm denies wrongdoing

PENNSYLVANIA RECORD

Thursday, November 21, 2024

Fla. energy company says Tucker Arensberg and its attorneys acted fraudulently in land deal; Firm denies wrongdoing

Courtscalesgavel026

PITTSBURGH – A Florida oil and gas company has initiated litigation against a Pittsburgh law firm, one of its partners and an ex-associate, claiming their collective fraud and deception caused them to lose $678,000 in direct funds and $35 million in potential revenue and profit generation.

Prime Energy and Chemical of Jupiter, Fla. filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on March 15 versus the law firm of Tucker Arensberg, one of its current partners Michael A. Shiner and one of its former attorneys, Kenneth L. Carroll III, all of Pittsburgh.

The plaintiff accuses Tucker Arensberg, Shiner and Carroll, along with their clients, Mark A. Thompson and his business Mid-East Oil Company, of independently and collectively committing a number of fraudulent acts throughout the years 2015 and 2016.

In a statement issued to the Pennsylvania Record, Tucker Arensberg denied any and all wrongdoing on its own part and that of its attorneys.

“Tucker Arensberg, P.C. is aware of the lawsuit filed on behalf of Prime Energy and Chemical, LLC. Prime is not, and has never been, a client of the firm. The firm is investigating the matter and believes there is no merit to the allegations contained in the complaint and intends to vigorously defend against those allegations,” the firm’s statement read.

“With respect to the assertions in the complaint, the firm believes that they are false. The firm is confident that the court proceedings will validate that the conduct of the firm’s attorneys was ethical and in compliance with the law. It is the firm’s policy not to comment on ongoing litigation matters. Therefore, there will be no further comments about this case by Tucker Arensberg, P.C.” 

The alleged acts include:

• Misrepresenting Thompson’s alleged ownership of the Swamp Angel property in McKean County, whose assets the plaintiff intended to purchase for $3 million through MarcellX (not owned by Thompson) and Mid-East Oil, while fraudulently concealing the Prushnok Family of Punxatawney, who are the true owners of MarcellX and the Swamp Angel property. The assets included the property lease, 164 existing oil and gas wells, rights for drilling future wells and shallow mineral rights in drilling to the Haskill Formation, at a depth of 2,600 feet below the ground.

• Misrepresenting that Prime Energy’s $600,000 deposit for the purchase of the Swamp Angel property, which comprised 20 percent of the total purchase price, was being placed into an attorney escrow account named for Tucker Arensberg/Shiner, but instead knowing it was not transferred to that account – rather, it was allegedly transferred to an account controlled by Thompson and not used as a deposit to purchase the property from the true owners, the Prushnok Family – while supposedly also participating in procuring an additional $78,800 from Prime Energy & Chemical, and claiming it was being applied to the purchase of the property.

• Misrepresenting the purported absence of pending litigation to which the property and assets were subject, when in fact a multi-million-dollar investment fraud was at that time pending before the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania – a case surrounding the very same Swamp Angel property and in which Tucker Arensberg represented Thompson and Mid-East Oil Company – which ultimately resulted in a recent $2 million fraud judgment being levied against both Thompson and his company.

• Systematically and fraudulently concealing the aforementioned wrongdoing from Prime Energy & Chemical.

• Being negligent in its supervision of the activity of Shiner and Carroll alleged, with Tucker Arensberg bearing responsibility under the respondeat superior theory of liability.

• Directly causing the loss of Prime Energy & Chemical’s $678,800 and a two-year postponement in the fulfillment of Prime Energy & Chemical’s revenue and profit generation for the property, which, measured according to the selling and financial documents prepared by defendants and their clients, has resulted in further losses to Prime Energy & Chemical in excess of $35 million, for which recovery is sought.

For alleged counts of fraud, reckless misrepresentation, negligent supervision and negligence under the respondeat superior theory of liability, the plaintiff is seeking direct damages of $678,800, consequential damages of at least $34,892,000, punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial, which plaintiff will ask to be equal to treble the amount of direct and consequential damages, interest, attorney’s fees, costs and such further relief as may be deemed just, in addition to a trial by jury.

The plaintiff is represented by Charles B. Manuel Jr. of Manuel & Associates, in New York, N.Y.

The defendants are represented by James R. Schadel, Scott R. Eberle and Stephen L. Guzzetti of Burns White, in Pittsburgh.

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania case 2:18-cv-00345

From the Pennsylvania Record: Reach Courts Reporter Nicholas Malfitano at nickpennrecord@gmail.com

More News