Quantcast

Lawsuit by Philadelphia coffee barista allegedly fired for refusing to participate in drug activity scheduled for trial

PENNSYLVANIA RECORD

Thursday, November 21, 2024

Lawsuit by Philadelphia coffee barista allegedly fired for refusing to participate in drug activity scheduled for trial

Lawsuits
Shutterstock 146730020

PHILADELPHIA – The case of a coffee barista who claims he was unlawfully fired when he refused to participate in a drug-dealing operation on his employer's premises is scheduled to reach a Philadelphia courtroom later this year.

According to a case management order released by Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas Judge Arnold L. New last Aug. 28, all pre-trial motions in the matter were to be filed before Sept. 2, and a pre-trial conference was to be scheduled any time after Nov. 4. It is expected the case will be ready for trial on Dec. 2.

Antoine Wilson of Philadelphia first filed suit in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas on May 30 against Quaker City Coffee Company, LLC, Bodhi Limited, LLC, Christian Dennis and Bobby Logue, also all of Philadelphia.

Wilson stated he was hired by defendant Dennis, whom he had known prior to his employment, in early September 2017 and worked for Bodhi Limited and Quaker City Coffee Company for about nine months.

Wilson added Dennis, a minority-owner and high-level manager of both coffee shops, is an ex-convict who served prison time for drug dealing – and that he himself had also been convicted and served prison time for drug dealing, before later being released in February 2016, enrolling and matriculating in college and working full-time, putting his prior life behind him.

“The express goal publicized by defendants in interviews, literature and online publications was to operate defendants Bodhi Limited and Quaker City Coffee Company for altruistic purposes in helping ex-convicts reintegrate into the workplace (and community as a whole). To that end, defendants have and continue to hire numerous individuals with criminal convictions (or who were recently incarcerated),” the suit stated.

“Defendant Dennis has used his recruitment of ex-convicts to further his criminal enterprise and continued drug-dealing notwithstanding his lengthy criminal history and public (business-related) interviews, given that he put such a life behind him. In other words, he attempted to exploit his position of power and business ownership with access to ex-convicts who would likely do his criminal bidding.”

As of December 2017, Wilson stated he was performing well at his barista job, something recognized in a text message from Bodhi Limited and Quaker City Coffee Company majority owner and defendant Logue, who commended him for his efforts and implied Wilson would be promoted into a greater role in 2018.

At the start of that year, Wilson said his employment experience changed in a negative way, when he became aware of Dennis’s drug-dealing operation – one which he said transpired on the premises of both coffee shops and involved other staff members, who served as both dealers and customers. In addition, Wilson said drug use occurred on site and co-owner Dennis attempted to actively recruit him into selling drugs.

By March 2018, Wilson said his opposition to drug use and sales in the workplace and his refusal to participate in same had become very vocal, leading to dissention with Dennis, greater scrutiny of his work and a reduction in his work hours. Finally, on May 25, Wilson states he learned of his firing through a written letter, which claimed he was let go “via layoff…due to an organizational restructure.”

“Plaintiff’s termination from employment was not due to a ‘layoff’ or ‘lack of work’ as alleged by defendant, as: (1) Plaintiff could have easily worked in another location of defendant as he had in the past; (2) Defendants had hired new staff in or around the time of plaintiff’s termination from employment; (3) Business was not slower; and (4) Defendants retained known problematic employees, including those literally doing drugs in the workplace, instead of applying neutral criteria in keeping a solid-performing employee like plaintiff. Plaintiff’s termination was retaliatory and pre-textual,” the suit said.

The plaintiff is represented by Ari R. Karpf, Julia W. Clark, Atusa Shirasb and David N. Korsen of Karpf Karpf Cerutti, in Bensalem.

The defendants are represented by Brendan D. Hennessy of Hennessy Law, in Malvern.

Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas case 180503233

From the Pennsylvania Record: Reach Courts Reporter Nicholas Malfitano at nick.malfitano@therecordinc.com

More News