Pennsylvania Record

Friday, February 28, 2020

Judge: Plaintiff in transphobia case against UPenn Hospital permitted to remain anonymous

Federal Court

By Nicholas Malfitano | Jan 9, 2020

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

PHILADELPHIA – A transgender woman and former employee of The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania who sued the institution for wrongful termination, civil rights discrimination and sex discrimination after a recovery room incident that allegedly led to her firing, will be permitted to remain anonymous for the time being.

On Dec. 9, U.S. District Court Judge Mitchell S. Goldberg approved the motion as to the subject of the plaintiff’s desire to remain anonymous in the litigation without prejudice, by mutual agreement of the parties. Further, the issue may be revisited, if necessary, prior to trial.

Jane Doe first filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on July 2 versus The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, The University of Pennsylvania, The University of Pennsylvania Health System Dr. Octavia Pickett-Blakely, John Does 1-10, and Police Officers Richard Roes 1-10, all of Philadelphia.

Per the litigation, Doe was an employee of HUP who was out as a trans woman there and participated in trans and LGBT guidance as part of an LGBT Employee group, which provided education and policy guidance for the treatment of LGBT people at the hospital.

On Feb. 20, 2018, Doe entered HUP as a patient for a routine medical procedure and recovery, but claims that internal guidelines at the hospital specifically set up to treat trans patients were not followed in her case.

“HUP and the other defendants ignored Ms. Doe’s specific instructions regarding her sensitivity to anesthesia and the nature of her post-anesthesia recovery, and failed to treat her accordingly. As a result, Ms. Doe awoke in the recovery room disoriented and panicked,” the suit stated.

“HUP and the other defendants then failed to provide Ms. Doe with any medication to treat her disorientation despite it being requested by an on-site doctor. HUP and the other defendants ignored Ms. Doe’s panic, simply watching as she started to climb out of her bed seeking help. She did not know where she was.”

Doe said in her disorientation, she attempted to leave her bed and was restrained by responding personnel who allegedly did not provide medical assistance. When Doe fought back, members of the UPenn Police Department also arrived and physically subdued her, the suit claimed.

Doe claimed she was then dumped into a wheelchair, partially naked, wheeled though the hospital, and left on the street.

Doe suffers from gender dysphoria, a condition “associated with clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning” and claims the personnel who handled the incident acted with “transphobic hatred.”

According to the complaint, Doe “is a person with a disability within the definitions of the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act because of an actual or perceived physical or mental impairment, whether or not the impairment limits or is perceived to limit a major life activity.”

After the incident, Doe said her GD flared and she experienced difficulty in returning to her workplace at HUP, which not only allegedly failed to make reasonable accommodation for her but also allegedly fired her under illegal pretenses on June 28, 2018.

“Ms. Doe wrote to the Commonwealth’s Secretary of Health, herself a trans woman, Dr. Rachel Levine, seeking some kind of help. An investigation was initiated by the Commonwealth into HUP’s treatment of Ms. Doe,” the suit states.

“HUP’s Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Neil O. Fishman, admitted to the state health care investigator that ‘a number of [HUP’s] internal processes have been reviewed and revised based on this incident.”

Yet, Doe alleged her medical records for the day contain no reference to “the incident” in question.

Patrick Norton, Penn Medicine’s Vice President for Public Affairs, offered a brief comment in response to the complaint after it was initially filed.

“While we are unable to comment on pending litigation, respect for all patients is a cornerstone of care at Penn Medicine facilities,” Norton said.

For counts of assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment, medical malpractice, wrongful termination, violations of right to privacy, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for sex discrimination, Titles I-III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Rehabilitation Act, the plaintiff is seeking compensatory and punitive damages, attorneys’ fees, costs, and disbursements, such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper, plus a trial by jury is demanded on all counts.

On Nov. 7, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss all counts aside from those of assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress and false imprisonment. Counsel for the plaintiff filed an opposing motion on that matter on Nov. 29.

The plaintiff is represented by Julie Chovanes of Chovanes Law, in Philadelphia.

The defendants are represented by Joe H. Tucker Jr., Kathleen Kirkpatrick and Leslie Miller Greenspan of Tucker Law Group, also in Philadelphia.

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case 2:19-cv-02881

From the Pennsylvania Record: Reach Courts Reporter Nicholas Malfitano at

Want to get notified whenever we write about U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania ?

Sign-up Next time we write about U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.

Organizations in this Story

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

More News