Quantcast

Dismissed Latrobe firefighters file suit over their termination and alleged behavior of their then-department chief

PENNSYLVANIA RECORD

Sunday, December 22, 2024

Dismissed Latrobe firefighters file suit over their termination and alleged behavior of their then-department chief

Federal Court
5f455a16b257e

PITTSBURGH – A lawsuit from a group of five ex-volunteer firefighters in Latrobe says they were ousted from their department earlier this year after voicing opposition to the alleged behavior of its chief.

Christopher Blessing, Cody Giovannagelo, Fabian Giovannagelo, Nico Giovannagelo and Ryan Jones of McKeesport filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on Aug. 14 versus the City of Latrobe, Mayor Rosemarie M. Wolford, the Latrobe Volunteer Fire Department, Fire Chief John Brasile and Fire Department President Chuck McDowell Jr. All parties of Latrobe.

At Latrobe Goodwill Hose Company No. 1 in 2019 and 2020, the lawsuit alleges Brasile was tardy in showing up to the scenes of fire emergency situations, falsely claimed to have been on scene at situations where he wasn’t actually present, attempted to remotely supervise fire scenes while on vacation, made a series of sexist and racist comments regarding firefighters or their spouses, and removed his opponent from the ballot in last year’s election for chief.

Per the suit, Brasile allegedly labeled a female firefighter as a “sl–t”, two other firefighters as the department’s “Mexicans” and the wife of another firefighter as a “fat f–ing c–t.”  Plaintiff Fabian Giovannagelo confronted Brasile about his language and several safety concerns, the suit said.

In November 2019, plaintiff Nico Giovannagelo – Fabian’s son – was nominated as an electoral candidate to be the department’s fire chief.

On Dec. 2, just days before the election, Brasile suspended Nico and six other firefighters, allegedly without cause. Due to being suspended, Nico was removed from the ballot and Brasile won the election unopposed.

Though Brasile claimed the suspended firefighters responded to fire emergencies under the influence of drugs or alcohol and/or claimed to have responded to fire scenes where they were not present, the plaintiffs deny these charges and counter that Brasile’s only rationale for suspending them is because they opposed him.

Last January, members Hose Company No. 1 voted to investigate Brasile’s action and suspend him from the position as fire chief. However, Wolford overturned the decision, allegedly saying, “If you want a new chief, you need a new vote.”

On March 5, Hose Company No. 1 members voted to oust Brasile and appoint Nico Giovannagelo as the new chief by a vote of 32-17, though Brasile said it was only because his supporters did not participate in the election that he was not victorious. Brasile was ousted by the members the following day.

However, the City of Latrobe later decided that the election was invalid and transferred Brasile to Hose Company No. 2. On May 27, Brasile then expelled the five plaintiffs without apparent explanation.

“Defendant Brasile’s expulsion of plaintiffs was not preceded by any notice, progressive discipline or due process of any kind and contained false, fabricated, nonsensical, pre-textual reasons for each expulsion. In violation of the Latrobe City Code, defendant Fire Department Bylaws and Hose Company No. 1 by-laws, defendant Brasile’s expulsion letters falsely represented that plaintiffs’ appeal had to be made directly to him,” the suit states.

“Plaintiffs were never properly or legally notified of a date, time and location of any appeal hearing or that plaintiffs’ appeal would be heard by a Board of Appeals, as mandated by the applicable by-laws.”

They were later told that their expulsions were upheld at the appeal hearing, despite receiving no advance notice of that hearing.

The plaintiffs say that Brasile, McDowell and the City of Latrobe collectively conspired to wrongfully expel them for exercising their 1st Amendment right to criticize Brasile.

For counts of violating the 1st Amendment through retaliation, violating the 14th Amendment through lack of due process, municipal liability under Monell, conspiracy and supervisory liability, the plaintiffs are seeking a declaration that defendants have violated plaintiffs’ civil rights, compensatory damages in excess of $150,000, punitive damages, exemplary damages, extensive injunctive relief reinstating the plaintiffs, the fire chief election results and preventing any further illegal conduct, attorney’s fees, costs, pre judgment interest and such other equitable relief as the Court should deem just and proper, plus a trial by jury

The plaintiffs are represented by Frederick E. Charles of The Charles Law Office, in Allentown.

The defendants have not yet obtained legal counsel.

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania case 2:20-cv-01212

From the Pennsylvania Record: Reach Courts Reporter Nicholas Malfitano at nick.malfitano@therecordinc.com

More News