Quantcast

Lancaster plaintiff alleges local police officers used excessive force and taser on him in 2019

PENNSYLVANIA RECORD

Friday, November 22, 2024

Lancaster plaintiff alleges local police officers used excessive force and taser on him in 2019

Federal Court
Jameselee

Lee | The Lee Firm

ALLENTOWN – A Lancaster man alleges that he was unlawfully assaulted, battered and tased with deadly force, without justification and in violation of his civil rights by local police officers in 2019.

Ivan Ruiz-Rivera filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on May 6 versus the City and County of Lancaster, Lancaster County Police Officers Bingham and Lapp, John Does 1-5 and ABC Corporations 1-25. All parties are of Lancaster.

“On or about Dec. 6, 2019, at 5:04 a.m., defendant Bingham, alleged that he was dispatched to 33 Belmont Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, regarding an incident of domestic violence that involved the plaintiff, Ruiz-Rivera. The aforementioned call did not come from the residence in question, nor did it come from anyone who lived within the residence,” the suit states.

“It was alleged, in the incident report, that this domestic assault was taking place in or near a red SUV. Upon arriving on the scene, a red SUV was parked in front of the residence located at 33 Belmont Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Defendant Bingham exited his cruiser and approached the red SUV. Soon thereafter, plaintiff Ruiz-Rivera observed police vehicles in front of his residence and approached defendant Bingham instructing the officer to leave his property. Defendant Bingham stated to plaintiff Ruiz-Rivera that he was on the public street and not on the plaintiff’s property.”

Next, the suit states that Ruiz-Rivera had a verbal confrontation and was then tased in the back.

“At this time, Plaintiff Ruiz-Rivera is screaming in pain and yells “leave me alone.” Immediately, defendant Bingham, Officer Lapp and other officers tackled plaintiff Ruiz-Rivera and started to punch him, without provocation. While plaintiff Ruiz-Rivera is being brutally attacked, he is asking ‘Why are you hitting me? Did I hit you?” the suit states.

“After plaintiff Ruiz-Rivera was assaulted and handcuffed, he continuously asked the officers to leave his property and to not allow his children to see this. After plaintiff Ruiz-Rivera was handcuffed, he asked if he could turn around on his back, and defendant Bingham angrily stated, ‘Nope, stay like that.”

As the direct and proximate result of the acts of defendants, plaintiff Ruiz-Rivera suffered mental shock, trauma and mental distress. The suit further alleges that police brutality is “rampant” in Lancaster, and that the City and its police department has a custom of both condoning alleged instances of police brutality and for exonerating officers for allegedly using excessive force against its citizens.

“The Lancaster Police Department and the City of Lancaster had a custom policy and practice of not taking reasonable steps to properly train its police officers to not violate the constitutionally protected rights of the citizens of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. More particularly the residents of Lancaster,” per the suit.

“The failure of the defendant Lancaster Police Department and the City of Lancaster to properly train its police officers, including but limited to the defendants, which constitutes a municipal policy or custom of the City of Lancaster and the Lancaster City Police Department, amounts to deliberate indifference to the rights of people with whom its police officers come into contact, including, but not limited to, the plaintiff herein.”

For counts of violating 42 U.S.C. Sections 1983 and 1985, the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution and Article I of the Pennsylvania Constitution, conspiracy, violation of due process, assault and battery, excessive force, negligent infliction of emotional distress and state law claims, the plaintiff is seeking damages in an amount not less than $350,000, attorney’s fees, costs, expenses, interest and a trial by jury.

The plaintiff is represented by James E. Lee of The Lee Firm, in Philadelphia.

The defendants have not yet obtained legal counsel.

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case 5:21-cv-02105

From the Pennsylvania Record: Reach Courts Reporter Nicholas Malfitano at nick.malfitano@therecordinc.com

More News