PHILADELPHIA – The Borough of Pottstown and its police officials deny accusations that they imposed excessive force upon a Chester County woman when they arrested the plaintiff at Pottstown Hospital two years ago.
Christine Caporaletti of Spring City first filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on July 23 versus Chief Michael Markovich, Police Officers Peter Yambrick, Matthew Maciejewski, John Does 1-99, Dylan Heckart, Jane Doe, the Borough of Pottstown, Pottstown Hospital and ABC Security Company of Pottstown, plus Tower Health of West Reading.
“At all relevant times, Michael Graeff lived with plaintiff, Caporaletti, in her residence, and plaintiff considered him to be ‘like a son.’ On Thursday, July 25, 2019, Graeff was overwhelmed by a mental health crisis. Concerned for his safety, at approximately 1:22 p.m., plaintiff placed a phone call to 9-1-1 so that Graeff could receive a mental health evaluation,” the suit said.
“Sergeant Edward Ciacik of the Limerick Police Department was the first to respond and arrive at plaintiff’s home. Next, the paramedics arrived to take Graeff to Pottstown Hospital for an initial examination to determine if he should be admitted for involuntarily mental health treatment, as per Pennsylvania law and local laws/policies. Plaintiff and her daughter followed the ambulance to Pottstown Hospital.”
After going to the hospital and inquiring as to Graeff’s whereabouts, defendant Heckart [a hospital security guard] approached plaintiff and claimed, without any basis in fact, that Graeff did not want to see her and demanded that she leave the hospital. Caporaletti said she later found that this remark was false.
When the Pottstown Police defendants arrived to the hospital, the plaintiff said they arrested her in front of her daughter and roughly put her into handcuffs, just three months after she underwent arm surgery.
“Defendants Yambrick, Maciejewski and/or Doe, ignored plaintiff’s cries for help to relieve the pain in her right arm. After transporting the plaintiff to the Pottstown Police Department, an unknown police officer informed defendants Yambrick, Maciejewski and Doe, that they improperly handcuffed plaintiff. Plaintiff was charged with a singular summary count of Disorderly Conduct,” per the suit.
“As a direct and proximate result of the aforementioned acts and failures to act of defendants Markovich, Yambrick, Maciejewski, and/or Does 1-99, plaintiff suffered from the following non- exhaustive list of harms:
• Violation of her clearly established and well-settled constitutional rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution to be free from the use of unreasonable or excessive force;
• Full thickness tear of the rotator cuff involving the posterior fibers of the supraspinatus and anterior fibers of the infraspinatus;
• Moderate tendinopathy;
• Tendinopathy in the intra-articular portion of the biceps tendon;
• Bicipital tendinitis;
• Complete tear of right rotator cuff; and
• S/P arthroscopy of right shoulder.”
Pottstown Hospital and Tower Health moved to dismiss the case on Sept. 24, countering that the plaintiff hadn’t adequately pled her case.
UPDATE
That dismissal motion was rendered moot by the filing of an amended complaint.
On Oct. 12, the Borough of Pottstown and co-defendants Markovich, Yambrick and Maciejewski answered the complaint, denying its assertions while providing no less than two dozen affirmative defenses.
“Plaintiff fails to state a claim against Pottstown defendants upon which relief will be granted. Pottstown defendants’ actions did not violate plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment rights. Pottstown defendants asserts every defense available to them in the existing Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. No act, action, or omission of Pottstown defendants was the proximate cause or legal cause of any damage allegedly sustained by plaintiff and this constitutes a complete defense to the within causes of action,” the defenses read, in part.
“All pertinent conduct and action fallen by Pottstown defendants was done in accordance with all established and existing laws, rules, regulations, statutes and constitutions of the United States and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Plaintiff has failed to set forth sufficient facts for the imposition of punitive damages. If plaintiff suffered any damages as alleged, then such damages were caused by plaintiff’s own conduct and/or negligence or reckless conduct and not by any civil rights violations. Plaintiff has not sustained any recoverable damages because no conduct of Pottstown defendants caused plaintiff to sustain any damages or loss.”
The police defendants also asserted the affirmative defense of qualified immunity.
For counts of excessive force, supervisor liability, bystander liability, conspiracy, assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, joint participation, negligence, reckless endangerment, vicarious liability and a Monell claim, the plaintiff is seeking compensatory and punitive damages as to all defendants, reasonable attorney’s fees and costs as to all defendants, such other relief as may appear just and appropriate and a jury trial as to all claims asserted.
The plaintiff is represented by Alan E. Denenberg and Thomas Bruno II of Abramson & Denenberg, in Philadelphia.
The defendants are represented by Sheryl Lynn Brown of Siana Law in Chester Springs, plus Chilton G. Goebel III and Stephen J. Fleury Jr. of Saxton & Stump, in Malvern.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case 2:21-cv-03293
From the Pennsylvania Record: Reach Courts Reporter Nicholas Malfitano at nick.malfitano@therecordinc.com