Quantcast

Man seriously injured in tractor ride-gone-wrong sues manufacturer and Lowe's

PENNSYLVANIA RECORD

Thursday, November 28, 2024

Man seriously injured in tractor ride-gone-wrong sues manufacturer and Lowe's

Lawsuits
Peterdfriday

Friday | Friday & Cox

PITTSBURGH – A local man has sued the manufacturer and retailer of a tractor he purchased, one he said featured a non-working brake pedal which caused him to crash the tractor and become seriously injured.

John D. Cain of Pittsburgh initially filed suit in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas on July 19 versus Troy-Bilt, LLC of Upper Arlington, Ohio and Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC, of Mooresville, N.C.

(The filing of the complaint was preceded on June 7, 2019 by the filing of Writ of Summons, followed by unsuccessful mediation, leading the plaintiff’s claims to remain unresolved. This lack of resolution eventually led to the complaint’s filing.)

“In May 2017, plaintiff purchased the at-issue Bronco Lawn Tractor, Model No. 13AL78BS023, from a Lowe’s Home Improvement store. On June 17, 2017, plaintiff was using the at-issue tractor, as advertised and marketed by defendant, i.e. mowing lawns and driving the tractor on Centre Avenue, when he released his foot off the gas pedal, but the tractor failed to reduce its speed,” the suit says.

“Plaintiff then attempted to press on the brakes and when they failed to work properly, was unable to slow down the at-issue tractor, at which point the tractor continued to go downhill at an unsafe speed and unpredictable nature while plaintiff was still aboard. Due to the excessive speed and inability for the tractor to reduce such speed or come to a stop, plaintiff crashed the tractor and was thrown from the seat.”

The suit adds that as a result of the defendant’s negligence, defective product, unreasonably dangerous product, inadequate warnings and breach of warranty, the plaintiff sustained the following injuries, some of which are permanent: Dislocation of his left shoulder, skin lacerations and burns, shoulder hairline fracture, bruises, contusions, abrasions and other injuries in or about nerves, muscles, bones, tendons, ligaments, tissues and vessels of the body, and nervousness, emotional tension, anxiety and depression.

“As a direct and proximate result of the defendant’s negligence, defective product, unreasonably dangerous product, inadequate warnings and breach of warranties, plaintiff sustained the following damages, some or all of which are or may be continuing: Great and continuing pain and suffering, inconvenience, embarrassment, mental anguish and emotional and psychological trauma; Large medical expenses for treatment and care, medical supplies, rehabilitation and therapeutic treatment, medicines, attendant services and other treatments; Inability to enjoy various pleasures of life that he previously enjoyed; Lost earnings and plaintiff’s earning capacity has been diminished; Permanent disability and loss of impairment of general health, strength and vitality,” the suit states.

The defendants removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on Aug. 18, citing the amount in damages at issue and diversity of citizenship between the parties.

For multiple counts of negligence, strict products liability, breach of implied warranty, the plaintiff is seeking damages in excess of the jurisdictional limits of compulsory arbitration, together with court costs, interest and all other relief permitted by the Court.

The plaintiff is represented by Ian Watt and Peter D. Friday of Friday & Cox, in Pittsburgh.

The defendants are represented by Douglas M. Grimsley, Frederick W. Bode III, Michael A. Muha and Richard T. Coyne of Dickie McCamey & Chilcote, in Pittsburgh and Cleveland, Ohio.

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania case 2:22-cv-01196

Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas case GD-19-008355

From the Pennsylvania Record: Reach Courts Reporter Nicholas Malfitano at nick.malfitano@therecordinc.com

More News