PITTSBURGH – A Maryland woman alleges that a faulty escalator at the Pittsburgh Zoo which stopped working suddenly and abruptly, led her to fall forward and sustain a series of severe injuries during a visit two years ago.
Janet DiMatteo of Charlotte Hall, Md. filed suit in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas on April 3 versus Zoological Society of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh Zoo & Aquarium and Industrial Elevator Maintenance, Inc. (doing business as “Industrial/Commercial Elevator”), all of Pittsburgh.
“On or about April 17, 2021, at approximately 4:45 p.m., plaintiff Janet DiMatteo was a business invitee and was lawfully on the premises of the defendants. At approximately 4:45 p.m., plaintiff and her family walked toward the exit of the premises. At the above time and place, two escalators were located at the exit of the premises. At the above time and place, several dozen individuals were exiting the premises by descending down the escalator located at the front of the park,” the suit says.
“At the above time and place, the escalator was so packed that nearly every step was filled, with some steps having two individuals standing on the step. Upon information and belief, at the above time and place, a child lifted the emergency safety button on the escalator and thereby stopped the escalator's movement. At the above time and place, no exigent or emergency circumstances existed to warrant the child to access and activate the escalator's emergency stop button. At the above time and place, plaintiff was on the descending escalator and was located about one-quarter of the way down the escalator.”
The suit adds that the escalator in question made a loud high-pitched noise, when suddenly and without warning, the descending escalator abruptly stopped, leading individuals on the escalator to lurch forward from the momentum and at which point, a third-party fell forward on top of the plaintiff.
“As a result of the impact, plaintiff was violently thrown forward, face-first down the escalator, and landed face-down across several escalator steps. At the time of plaintiff’s fall on April 17, 2021, the escalator was in a defective, dangerous, and hazardous condition by containing an unguarded, open emergency button directly in access to children. In the alternative, it is believed and therefore averred that the escalator on which plaintiff was a passenger and the mechanism which operated the escalator was under the exclusive control of the defendants. In the alternative, the escalator on the premises, as installed and maintained by the defendants, created a dangerous and defective condition, specifically a mechanical failure which caused the escalator to stop abruptly and created the risk of an escalator passenger, such as plaintiff, from falling forward on the escalator. In the alternative, defendants knew or should have known that the poor design and maintenance of the escalator would result in serious bodily injury of those on the escalator. At all times relevant hereto, the defendants were responsible for the safety of the Zoo patrons, such as plaintiff and as such, owed a duty to provide a reasonably safe environment for all Zoo visitors, and to allow Zoo patrons to safely enter and/or exit the premises via the escalators,” the suit states.
“At all times relevant hereto, defendants knew or should have known that in the event that the emergency button was accessed and activated, during non-emergency circumstances and without warning to others, it would result in serious bodily injury of those on the escalator. At all times relevant hereto, the emergency stop button was located in such a way that was easily accessible and attractive to small children. At all times relevant hereto, defendants had actual and/or constructive notice of the existence of the aforesaid location and danger posed by the open, unguarded and easily accessible emergency stop button. The failure of defendants to properly or adequately correct the dangerous condition and/or forewarn plaintiff to the dangerous condition was a breach of defendants’ duty to plaintiff, a business invitee. Plaintiff’s injuries were caused solely by the carelessness and negligence of defendants, their agents, servants, contractors, and/or employees, and the defective condition on defendants’ premises as set forth herein. As a direct and proximate result of defendants’ breach of duty, plaintiff suffered severe injuries and damages which are more fully set forth below.”
The plaintiff’s injuries included a fractured rib, right ankle posterior tibial tendinitis, bilateral knee pain, left hip bursitis, left iliotibial band syndrome, contusions of lower extremities, knee lacerations, ankle lacerations, facial lacerations, eyelid bruising, facial lacerations, head pain, eye discomfort, limited mobility, limited range of motion and other injuries.
For two counts of negligence, the plaintiff is seeking damages in excess of the applicable arbitration limits, exclusive of interests and costs.
The plaintiff is represented by Anthony C. Mengine and Taylor M. Martucci of Kontos Mengine Killion & Hassen, in Pittsburgh.
The defendants have not yet secured legal counsel.
Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas case GD-23-004567
From the Pennsylvania Record: Reach Courts Reporter Nicholas Malfitano at nick.malfitano@therecordinc.com