Quantcast

Sexual assault suit against former Philly detective is consolidated with similar actions

PENNSYLVANIA RECORD

Thursday, November 21, 2024

Sexual assault suit against former Philly detective is consolidated with similar actions

Federal Court
Gp

Pappert | US Courts

PHILADELPHIA – The case of a man who spent more than 12 years in prison for murder and was later exonerated, who then sued the City of Philadelphia and a former Philadelphia Police Department detective whom he alleges sexually assaulted him, has now been consolidated with other actions against that same, now-incarcerated former detective.

Marvin Hill of Philadelphia filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on March 15 versus the City of Philadelphia and Philip Nordo, of Easton.

Hill, then 20, was arrested on Feb. 15, 2011, for the murder of Stacey Linwood Sharpe Jr., which had taken place in Philadelphia on Jan. 7, 2010.

In the days and months after Sharpe’s murder, Nordo investigated the crime and brought Hill in for detention and questioning at the Philadelphia Police Department Homicide Unit on more than one occasion, during which time “defendant Nordo interrogated, threatened and made repeated unwanted sexual advances towards the plaintiff.”

When Hill repeatedly rejected those advances, the suit says Nordo promised Hill that he would make sure Hill “never saw daylight again.” Allegedly, Nordo made good on those threats, finding witnesses who purportedly identified Hill as Sharpe’s killer in interviews – witnesses who much later recanted those identifications, saying they were under duress and/or coercion from Nordo.

Hill was convicted of Sharpe’s murder in January 2013 and sentenced to a prison term. However, surveillance video taken from just more than one block from the shooting, not presented at Hill’s trial and later offered for examination, proved conclusively that he could not have been Sharpe’s killer.

The suit alleges that the PPD had been aware of Nordo’s tactics since 2005, tactics which included grooming suspects for future sexual relationships, by promising leniency or reward money, using threats and coercion and then engaging in sexual assault.

Nonetheless, Nordo was not disciplined by the department and was promoted to the PPD’s Homicide Unit in 2009, giving him a wide latitude to continue committing his crimes for several years. Nordo was finally fired from the department in 2017, amid allegations that he had been engaging in police misconduct with potential witnesses and suspects for many years. This led to a grand jury indictment against Nordo in February 2019, for multiple counts of rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, sexual assault, misconduct, intimidation, and theft of city funds.

In December, Nordo was sentenced to 24-and-a-half to 49 years in prison after being convicted of those charges last June.

On Jan. 19, after spending more than 12 years behind bars, Hill was released from prison, pending his formal exoneration.

After the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office’s Conviction Integrity Unit reviewed the case and Hill’s claim of innocence, the Office requested that the Court enter a nolle prosse pursuant to Section 585(a), which was granted by the Hon. Barbara McDermott on Feb. 21.

The suit further explained that 18 other men were also convicted as a result of Nordo’s tactics and later fully exonerated, demonstrating the “pervasive patterns, practices and customs of official misconduct within the Homicide Unit of the PPD.”

UPDATE

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Judge Gerald J. Pappert April 14 ordered Hill’s action be consolidated with six other, similar actions also currently pending against Nordo.

“It is ordered that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a), the above-captioned civil action is consolidated with the actions previously consolidated before this Court under McCoy v. City of Philadelphia, Et.Al, Civil No. 21-1458,” Pappert ruled.

For counts of malicious prosecution in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, deprivation of liberty without due process and denial of a fair trial and a Monell violation under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and deprivation of liberty under state law, the plaintiff is seeking damages, jointly and severally, in excess of $75,000, including costs of suit, interest, attorney’s fees, punitive/exemplary damages and such other relief as this Honorable Court deems appropriate.

The plaintiff is represented by Anwar Abdur-Rahman, Joshua Ryan Van Naarden and Julia R. Ronnebaum of VSCP Law, in Philadelphia.

The defendants have not yet obtained legal counsel.

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case 2:23-cv-01002

From the Pennsylvania Record: Reach Courts Reporter Nicholas Malfitano at nick.malfitano@therecordinc.com

More News