Quantcast

Man alleges that not being transgender cost him his employment at Bucks County adult store

PENNSYLVANIA RECORD

Sunday, December 29, 2024

Man alleges that not being transgender cost him his employment at Bucks County adult store

Lawsuits
Davidmkoller

Koller | Koller Law

PHILADELPHIA – A former cleaner and clerk at a Bucks County-based adult establishment argues he was discriminated against and terminated from his employment, based upon his designation as a cisgender male.

David McCreary of Lansdale filed suit in the U.S District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on Nov. 6 versus Adult World, Inc. of Quakertown.

“Plaintiff is a biological male. In or around January 2023, defendant hired plaintiff in the position of Cleaner/Clerk. Plaintiff was well-qualified for his position and performed well. Since the start of plaintiff’s employment with defendant, Kevin Krupiewski, District Manager, has hired two transgender Clerks (DeDe Santiago and Courtney Robinson) at defendant’s Quakertown location. Throughout plaintiff’s employment, he has complained of disparate treatment between the transgender and non-transgender employees at defendant,” the suit says.

“In or around April 2023, plaintiff complained to Krupiewski that Santiago and Robinson frequently arrived late to work and kept the store open past store hours. Krupiewski refused to address plaintiff’s complaints, stating that he would not issue Santiago or Robinson write-ups. In fact, Krupiewski promoted Robinson to Store Manager within 90-days of the start of her employment. Plaintiff, who had worked at defendant longer, did not get offered a promotion within 90 days of his employment. In contrast, in or around March 2023, a customer made a false complaint about Stacy Yoder (biological female), Store Manager.”

The suit continues that Krupiewski “immediately wrote Yoder up for this complaint, despite the fact that the plaintiff, as a witness to the customer interactions, provided a statement disproving the complaint.”

“On or around June 4, 2023, Krupiewski approached plaintiff as he was opening the store in the morning. Krupiewski abruptly terminated plaintiff’s employment. Krupiewski stated the reason for termination was that plaintiff put a drape over the fire exit. Importantly, plaintiff had done this so that children could not look into defendant’s store window. Plaintiff had not been told to remove this drape prior. Krupiewski also alleged that plaintiff kept a tip jar on the counter. Krupiewski accused plaintiff of stealing money from the store. Prior to this day, plaintiff had not been told by anyone at defendant that there could not be a tip jar on the counter,” the suit states.

“That same day, Krupiewski terminated Yoder’s employment as well. Importantly, at that time, Yoder was the only other non-transgender employee that worked at defendant’s Quakertown location. A month prior, Krupiewski had terminated the only other non-transgender employee, Robert Warthington (biological male). Following plaintiff and Yoder’s same-day termination, Krupiewski only kept transgender employees on the staff at defendant’s Quakertown location. Following plaintiff’s termination, plaintiff contacted Tamika LNU, Payroll, and Sharon LNU, Human Resources. Tamika and Sharon stated that they were not aware of plaintiff’s termination and defendant did not have a termination letter prepared for him. It is plaintiff’s belief that he was discriminated against due to his gender in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act.”

For counts of gender discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, the plaintiff is seeking the following relief:

• Compensatory damages;

• Punitive damages;

• Liquidated damages;

• Emotional pain and suffering;

• Reasonable attorneys’ fees;

• Recoverable costs;

• Pre- and post-judgment interest;

• An allowance to compensate for negative tax consequences;

• A permanent injunction enjoining defendant, its directors, officers, employees, agents, successors, heirs and assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with it, from engaging in, ratifying, or refusing to correct, employment practices which discriminate in violation of Title VII and the PHRA.

• Order defendant to institute and implement, and for its employees, to attend and/or otherwise participate in, training programs, policies, practices and programs which provide equal employment opportunities;

• Order defendant to remove and expunge, or to cause to be removed and expunged, all negative, discriminatory, and/or defamatory memoranda and documentation from plaintiff’s record of employment, including, but not limited to, the pre-textual reasons cited for its adverse actions, disciplines and termination; and

• Awarding extraordinary, equitable and/or injunctive relief as permitted by law, equity and the federal statutory provisions sued hereunder, pursuant to Rules 64 and 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The plaintiff is represented by David M. Koller of Koller Law, in Philadelphia.

The defendant has not yet secured legal counsel.

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case 2:23-cv-04332

From the Pennsylvania Record: Reach Courts Reporter Nicholas Malfitano at nick.malfitano@therecordinc.com

More News