Quantcast

Giant Eagle injured shopper update: Supermarket says it's not at fault for fall in produce section

PENNSYLVANIA RECORD

Thursday, November 21, 2024

Giant Eagle injured shopper update: Supermarket says it's not at fault for fall in produce section

State Court
Gianteagle

PITTSBURGH – The Giant Eagle grocery store chain has discounted claims that it is liable for various bodily injuries that a Pittsburgh woman says she suffered in the produce section of its store in Monroeville.

Rebecca Stile of Pittsburgh first filed suit in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas on Sept. 28 versus Giant Eagle, Inc., of Monroeville.

Stile said she was shopping in the Monroeville Giant Eagle grocery store on Aug. 10, 2019, where she came upon the produce section – featuring products which the suit states need continuous moisture and irrigation to be properly maintained for sale.

The plaintiff argued that the store negligently allowed water from the produce irrigation system to spread to the floor. However, she added the store did not provide warning of slipping hazards on the store floor created by the produce irrigation.

As a result of that inherently dangerous condition, Stile said she fell when shopping in the aisle, and suffered serious injuries to her head, arms, knee and back in the process.

UPDATE

Counsel for Giant Eagle filed an answer to the complaint on Oct. 23, denying the assertions of Stile’s suit and providing new matter to the suit.

“The averments contained in plaintiff’s complaint contain conclusions of law to which no response is required, therefore, they are denied. To the extent that a response is deemed to be required, the averments are denied,” the answer stated.

Aside from denying the substance of the plaintiff’s complaint, the defendant also argued new matter should preclude Stile’s case.

“At all times relevant and material to this action, Giant Eagle acted with ordinary and prudent care and skill with respect to the areas under its control at the Giant Eagle store located in Monroeville, PA,” the new matter said.

“Giant Eagle avers that the incident described in plaintiff’s complaint and the injuries and damages allegedly sustained by plaintiff may have resulted from the negligent acts and/or omissions of persons or entities who were not servants, agents or employees of Giant Eagle and who were not acting within the course or scope of any employment with Giant Eagle.”

For a count of negligence, the plaintiff is seeking damages in excess of the arbitration limits of this county, including fees and costs as deemed appropriate by the Court, plus a trial by jury

The plaintiff is represented by David C. Brumfield of Alpern Schubert, in Pittsburgh.

The defendant is represented by James F. Rosenberg of Marcus & Shapira, also in Pittsburgh.

Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas case GD-20-010259

From the Pennsylvania Record: Reach Courts Reporter Nicholas Malfitano at nick.malfitano@therecordinc.com

More News