PHILADELPHIA – The mother of a boy who was crushed by an arcade game machine at a Chuck E. Cheese restaurant in Philadelphia has filed a lawsuit on his behalf, arguing that the manufacturer of the allegedly defective machine committed negligence.
Mary Kate Miller (individually and as parent/natural guardian of Aiden Miller, a minor) initially filed suit in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas on Sept. 27 versus Adrenaline Amusements, Inc. of Terrebonne, Quebec, Canada.
(The case was removed to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on Oct. 20.)
“On or about June 5, 2019, at approximately 6:15 p.m., plaintiff Aiden Miller was lawfully at a Chuck E. Cheese restaurant located at 9 Snyder Avenue in Philadelphia, PA when, because of the unreasonably dangerous conditions of defendant’s arcade machine, plaintiff was crushed by a Spinner Frenzy video game machine, which was manufactured and distributed by defendant Adrenaline, after the machine fell on top of him, causing injuries to plaintiff. Plaintiff was trapped under the machine, which weighs approximately 390 pounds, for approximately 15 seconds until he was freed by a bystander,” the suit says.
“Solely as a result of the negligence and carelessness of defendant, the plaintiff, Aiden Miller, suffered a traumatic crush injury resulting in a minimally displaced right superior ramus fracture and non-displaced left posterior iliac wing fracture, leg pain, post-traumatic stress disorder and those other conditions that have been documented by his treating physicians and contained in those physicians’ records, all directly as a result of the aforesaid defective condition of the defendant’s Spinner Frenzy arcade machine.”
Mary Kate continued that as a result of the defendant’s negligence, Aiden may continue to suffer great pain and agony, mental anguish, loss of life's pleasures, scarring, humiliation, and has been or may be in the future hindered from attending to his daily duties, functions, and occupations to his great damage and loss.
“Solely as a result of the above, plaintiffs, Mary Kay Miller and Aiden Miller, have in the past, are presently and will in the future be obliged to receive and undergo medical attention and care, and to expend various sums of money, or to incur various expenses for his injuries, and they may be obligated to continue to expend such sums of money or incur such expenses for an indefinite time into the future, to their great detriment and loss,” per the suit.
“As a further result of this incident, and by reason of the injuries aforesaid, plaintiff, Aiden Miller, has or may be in the future continue to suffer great pain and agony, mental anguish, loss of life's pleasures, scarring, humiliation, and has been or may be in the future hindered from attending to his daily duties, functions, and occupations to his great damage and loss.”
For counts of negligence and product liability, the plaintiff is seeking damages in excess of $50,000, plus interest and costs of suit.
The plaintiff is represented by Brad R. Krupnick of Fine & Staud, in Philadelphia.
The defendants is represented by Andrew J. Gallogly of Margolis Edelstein in Philadelphia, plus Kyle T. Geiger of Walker Wilcox Matousek, in Chicago, Ill.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case 2:21-cv-04603
Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas case 210802277
From the Pennsylvania Record: Reach Courts Reporter Nicholas Malfitano at nick.malfitano@therecordinc.com