Quantcast

Bellevue treasurer claims mayor, council violated Sunshine Law in voting on rainbow flags display during Pride Month

PENNSYLVANIA RECORD

Thursday, November 21, 2024

Bellevue treasurer claims mayor, council violated Sunshine Law in voting on rainbow flags display during Pride Month

State Court
Rainbowflag 760x475

PITTSBURGH – Bellevue’s borough treasurer is suing the mayor and borough council of the community for alleged violations of the Sunshine Act, a law which ensures decision-making transparency in governmental bodies and agencies, in approving a $20 expense to place rainbow flags in local parks in observance of Pride Month.  

Joseph Scioscia Jr. filed suit in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas on June 23 versus Mayor Emily Marburger, Councilman Val Pennington, Councilwoman Jodie Hause, Councilman Anthony DiTullio, Councilman Jeff Stuncard, Councilwoman Anya Pikul, Councilwoman Jilian Edmondson, Councilman Glenn Pritchard, Councilwoman Amanda Sloane and Director of Administrative Services Cindy Bahn. All parties are of Bellevue.

“A decision to spend taxpayer dollars is one of the most important actions that a borough or municipality undertakes. In Bellevue Borough, however, the discussion and decision to spend taxpayer dollars was held in private, without notice and without public debate or comment. Worse, this was done deliberately to avoid public comment or notice. It was glossed over as though it was an already-decided line. This action taken by defendants further prevented public comment or discussion,” the suit states.

The Pennsylvania Sunshine Law requires that any discussion of public matters and any votes on those matters are only be held in a public meeting which has been properly advertised and which is open to citizens to attend and comment.

Fines for violation of the Sunshine Law can range from $100 to $1,000 for a first offense, and up to $5,000 for a subsequent offense. The fines, as well as attorneys’ fees, can be levied against individual public officials, and the law prohibits the borough from paying them for individuals found guilty.

The suit explains Scioscia took action against his colleagues in the Bellevue Borough government, after they allegedly took official action in an email chain to spend money to purchase rainbow flags commemorating Pride Month to be flown at both Bayne Park and Memorial Park, during the month of June.

“On May 26, 2020, at the regularly-scheduled Borough of Bellevue council meeting, buried in the Parks and Recreation Committee report, the online vote to purchase flags was ratified. No discussion of the purchase occurred at the meeting by any of the members of council, the mayor or the director of administrative services. There was no ability for residents to make comment, nor was there any notice prior to the council meeting to the public that a discussion and vote to spend taxpayer money had been made in private,” according to the lawsuit.

“Since no discussion was had, nor explanation given during the Parks and Recreation report, the official action and discussion regarding the purchase happened during the course of the email chain initiated by defendant Emily Marburger. Further, all requests for official copies of the meeting minutes of the Borough of Bellevue Council meeting on May 26, 2020, as well as requests for official copies of the email chain, have been met with denials and refusals.”

The amount of money spent by the Bellevue Borough Council to purchase the flags was $20 and at the conclusion of the of the May 26, 2020 council meeting, Scioscia is said to have spoken as a private citizen in arguing the e-mail vote was in violation of the Sunshine Law – adding that by flying the flags, Bellevue would be offending the religious beliefs of some residents.

For multiple counts of violating the Sunshine Act, the plaintiff is seeking a declaration that the official action taken via email did indeed violate the Sunshine Act, permanent injunction to enjoin the Bellevue Borough Council from taking official action without opportunity for public discussion and comment at a public meeting, attorney’s fees, costs and such other and further relief that the Court deems just and appropriate.

The plaintiff is represented by Sean Logue of Sean Logue Law, in Carnegie.

The defendants have not yet secured legal counsel.

Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas case GD-20-007057

From the Pennsylvania Record: Reach Courts Reporter Nicholas Malfitano at nick.malfitano@therecordinc.com

More News