Quantcast

Couple whose son was taken for fear of abuse might lose lawsuit against UPMC

PENNSYLVANIA RECORD

Sunday, December 22, 2024

Couple whose son was taken for fear of abuse might lose lawsuit against UPMC

Federal Court
Upmc

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

PITTSBURGH – For failure to file a certificate of merit, Pittsburgh health care providers are looking to dismiss a lawsuit brought by a Western Pennsylvania couple against custodial and medical authorities for removing their then-eight-month-old son to foster care for two-and-a-half weeks, on the incorrect suspicion that they were the cause of his broken leg.

Kenan Gajarov and Lala Jamalova (as legal guardians and natural parents of minor R.G.) of Wexford first filed suit in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas on May 12 versus the Allegheny County Office of Children, Youth and Families, Allegheny County Department of Human Services Director Marc Cherna, the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Children’s Hospital and its Assistant Professor of Pediatrics and Physician Dr. Adelaide Eichmann, all of Pittsburgh.

On Sept. 16, 2018, the plaintiffs brought their then-eight-month-old child, R.G. to the pediatrician when he awoke in the early morning hours, inconsolably crying. The doctor diagnosed him with teething pain and prescribed Tylenol to treat it.

The following day, Sept. 17, 2018, the parent plaintiffs noticed something was wrong with R.G.’s leg and he was still in considerable pain. After reconvening with the pediatrician, the plaintiffs were directed to take the child to UPMC for evaluation, where he was diagnosed with a broken right leg.

“On or about Sept. 17, 2018, defendant Allegheny County Office of Children Youth and Families (OCYF) received a report about the minor child and his injuries. OCYF consulted with Dr. Adelaide Eichmann of the Children’s Advocacy Center,” the suit states.

“Dr. Adelaide Eichmann reported that the minor child was not mobile, due to low muscle tone, and would not have been able to cause this tibia fracture on his own, yet seemingly sought no further consult from pediatric orthopedics.”

Acting on this recommendation, in the next four days, R.G. was placed at a Bethany Christian Services foster home and removed to the custody of the OCYF.

However, on Oct. 5, 2018, OCYF supervisors learned from an independent pediatric orthopedic surgeon that an alternate and likely possibility was that R.G.’s leg became entangled in his crib during his sleep, and in his trying to dislodge it from the crib, accidentally broke his own leg.

“Unfortunately, as defendants refused to consider any alternative for cause of injury other than the extremely unlikely possibility, considering all of the evidence present at the time, including statements by the parent plaintiffs, that the parents caused this harm, the minor child was removed from the love, care and supervision of his parents for about 18 days,” according to the lawsuit.

On July 7, Assistant County Solicitor John A. Bacharach filed to remove the case to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, citing constitutional rights violations for substantive due process under the 14th Amendment.

“The complaint makes claims against the defendants for violation of the plaintiffs’ rights under the 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983, in addition to claims made under the law of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,” the removal notice read, in part.

“The complaint claims that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to the plaintiffs’ substantive due process rights guaranteed by the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution by removing or causing to be removed their children and placing them in foster care pursuant to an investigation of suspected child abuse without first conducting an adequate investigation.”

UPDATE

On July 30, counsel for UPMC Children’s Hospital and Eichmann filed a notice of intent to enter judgment of non pros against the plaintiffs, for failure to file a certificate of merit.

“Pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1042.7, I intend to move for Judgment of Non Pros against you in this Court after 30 days of the filing of this notice, if a certificate of merit is not filed as required by Rule 1042.3,” said a motion from Sally A. Frick and Marcelle M. Theis of Dickie McCamey & Chilcote.

“This notice is served on behalf of the defendants, UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh and Adelaide Eichmann, M.D. The judgment will be entered as to all of plaintiffs’ claims against UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh and Adelaide Eichman, M.D.”

For counts of negligent infliction of emotional distress, state-created danger and a substantive due process violation, unconstitutional policies and customs under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and negligence, the plaintiffs are seeking damages in excess of $50,000, plus interest and costs.

The plaintiffs are represented by Matthew J. Scanlon of Scanlon & Wojton, in Pittsburgh.

The defendants are represented by Sally A. Frick and Marcelle M. Theis of Dickie McCamey & Chilcote and Assistant County Solicitors John A. Bacharach and Frances M. Leibenguth, all also in Pittsburgh.

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania case 2:20-cv-01017

Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas case GD-20-005729

From the Pennsylvania Record: Reach Courts Reporter Nicholas Malfitano at nick.malfitano@therecordinc.com

More News