Quantcast

PENNSYLVANIA RECORD

Sunday, September 15, 2024

Nanny sues, says she was fired after child concussed her with bird figurine

Lawsuits
Webp robertfdaley

Daley | Robert Peirce & Associates

PITTSBURGH – A nanny has filed suit against her former employers, claiming they fired her after their child struck her on the head with a wooden figurine and caused her to suffer a concussion.

Bethany Phillips of Oakmont filed suit in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas on Sept. 26 versus Christopher Duerr, Helen Duerr and Patricia Sims, all of Pittsburgh.

“Plaintiff Bethany Phillips is a highly qualified and experienced nanny who has worked for several families in the Pittsburgh area with great success. Phillips began working as a professional nanny for defendants Christopher and Helen Duerr on Nov. 29, 2021. Phillips was tasked with caring for the couple’s two year-old daughter, H.D. At the time of her hiring, Phillips was told by Mr. and Mrs. Duerr that they hoped for her to be a longtime employee who would care for H.D. and any additional children that the family welcomed. Phillips enjoyed her position with the Duerr family and took pride in providing excellent care to H.D,” the suit states.

“Through her employment, Phillips worked 37 hours per week at a rate of $23 per hour. Phillips spent her time focused on providing age-appropriate childcare to H.D., including conducting learning activities, listening to music, playing games, doing arts and crafts and dancing together. It is important to note that H.D. was both large for her age and acted out aggressively with no visible signs or warnings. Mr. and Mrs. Duerr were aware of H.D.’s aggressive outbursts and did not work to correct or discipline H.D. and did not allow others, including Phillips, to discipline H.D. in a way to eliminate these behaviors. Despite the child’s propensities, Phillips was instructed by Mr. and Mrs. Duerr to not punish or reprimand H.D. in any manner. As a result, Phillips focused on re-directing H.D. to other activities at times when she became aggressive or agitated without prior warning.”

The suit continues that on March 7, 2022, Phillips went to the Duerrs’ home, as scheduled, to render nanny services to H.D. At that time, Mr. and Mrs. Duerr were away at a local hospital, where Mrs. Duerr was in the process of giving birth to the couple’s second child.

In anticipation for the birth of their second child, Mrs. Duerr previously informed Phillips that her mother, Patricia Sims, would to come to their home and care for H.D. during the time period when the couple was occupied at the hospital.

Mrs. Duerr told Phillips that Ms. Sims would be in charge of both the household and H.D. while she and Mr. Duerr were unavailable, but she requested that Phillips still come to the home on those dates in order to provide consistency for H.D. Phillips agreed.

“On March 7, 2022, Ms. Sims, was present at the Duerrs’ home to provide care to H.D. when Phillips arrived for the purpose of providing consistency for the child. At some point during the mid-morning on March 7, 2022, Phillips, Ms. Sims and H.D. were sitting together in the first-floor living room located off of the kitchen in the Duerrs’ home. Ms. Sims was seated on the couch, and Phillips was seated on the floor where she was playing with H.D. For a brief moment, H.D. walked behind Phillips, though she remained in the room and within the sight of Ms. Sims. Unbeknownst to Phillips, H.D. picked up a decorative bird figurine with a wooden base. The figurine, which was approximately eight-to-twelve inches in height, was located in the living room on top of a lamp table that was not far from where Phillips was seated. This hard, decorative object was within the reach of H.D,” the suit says.

“Without warning or provocation, H.D. walked up to Phillips from behind and slammed the figurine onto the top of her head. Ms. Sims, who was facing the child as H.D. grabbed the object and approached Phillips, provided no notice or warning of the obvious danger of the approaching child. Phillips immediately felt extreme pain in her head. In response, Ms. Sims told Phillips to put the bird on a top shelf in the cupboard and then gave Phillips an ice pack and encouraged her to sit on the couch. Phillips almost immediately developed light sensitivity and Ms. Sims gave her a pair of sunglasses to wear to help with her headache. Phillips did her best to pull herself together amid extreme pain in her head and eyes; however, she was disoriented and unable to cope with the discomfort. In the afternoon, she went home for the rest of the day, leaving H.D. in the care of her maternal grandmother — who had been designated to provide her care by Mr. and Mrs. Duerr.”

As Phillips says she began to experience worsening symptoms of head pain and brain fog, Mrs. Duerr, who had given birth to her second child that day, called Phillips from the hospital.

Mrs. Duerr asked Phillips if she was okay, and Phillips briefly described her symptoms. Ultimately, Mrs. Duerr told Phillips that she should take off the following day to rest. Phillips agreed and sent her congratulations to the family for welcoming their new baby.

“The next day, March 9, 2022, Phillips visited her primary care physician, Dr. Christina Alimin. She underwent a CT scan and was diagnosed with a concussion. As a result, Phillips was prohibited from all activities, including driving, for seven days. Phillips informed Mr. and Mrs. Duerr that she was unable to work for the following week, in accordance with the physician’s order. On March 16, 2022, Phillips had a virtual follow-up appointment where, despite her ongoing symptoms, she was cleared to return to work. She immediately contacted Mr. and Mrs. Duerr to inform them that she would return to work the following morning; however, Mr. and Mrs. Duerr told her that her employment was terminated, effective immediately, because the family did not feel that she could provide loving care for H.D. in light of the incident. As time passed, Phillips’ concussion symptoms did not improve, and she began treating at the UPMC Concussion Institute with Dr. Jonathan French, a neuropsychologist,” the suit says.

“Under the care of Dr. French, Phillips reported experiencing ongoing migraines, difficulty with eye pain and pressure, cognitive problems, sleep disturbance and neck pain. Dr. French diagnosed Phillips with a cerebral concussion as a result of being hit on the head by a wooden object and prescribed vestibular therapy. Phillips was additionally referred to the Headache Clinic, where she began treating under the care of Dr. Claire Yanta, a neurologist specializing in concussion. Under the care of Dr. Yanta, Phillips reported headaches, nausea, eye pain and pressure, and light sensitivity, in addition to her existing symptoms. Dr. Yanta diagnosed Phillips with post-traumatic concussion syndrome and prescribed her a course of dexamethasone and rizatriptan. To date, Phillips continues to experience headaches on a nearly daily basis ranging from dull to debilitating. Her long-term prognosis is unclear, and she continues to take medication and seek appropriate treatment.”

For one count of negligence, the plaintiff is seeking damages in excess of the jurisdictional limits of compulsory arbitration, plus all costs, interest and such other and further relief as this Honorable Court may deem just and equitable.

The plaintiff is represented by Robert F. Daley, Kirstin F. Kennedy and Adriana Frontino of Robert Peirce & Associates, in Pittsburgh.

The defendants have not yet obtained legal counsel.

Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas case GD-23-011263

From the Pennsylvania Record: Reach Courts Reporter Nicholas Malfitano at nick.malfitano@therecordinc.com

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

More News